• Kaja Kallas
  • Moussa Faki Mahamat
  • Adrian Zenz
  • Matthew Kroenig
  • Andriy Yermak
  • Vitaly Savelyev
  • Oleksandr Korniyenko
  • Dainius Kreivys
View All
IPSE'S AUTHORS LAST 24h
  • No New Authors inserted in the last 24 hours
Check all the Authors in the last 24h
IPSEs IN THE LAST 24H
  • Emmanuel Macron
    Emmanuel Macron “If the Russians were to break through the front lines, if there were a Ukrainian request [of sending ground troops to Ukraine], which is not the case today, we would legitimately have to ask ourselves this question.” 16 hours ago
  • David Cameron
    David Cameron “We will give three billion pounds every year for as long as is necessary. We've just really emptied all we can in terms of giving equipment. The aid package was the largest from the UK so far. Some of that (equipment) is actually arriving in Ukraine today, while I'm here. Ukraine has a right to use the weapons provided by London to strike targets inside Russia, and that it was up to Kyiv whether to do so. Ukraine has that right. Just as Russia is striking inside Ukraine, you can quite understand why Ukraine feels the need to make sure it's defending itself.” 16 hours ago
View All IPSEs inserted in the Last 24h
NEW CONTEXTS IN THE LAST 24H
  • No New Contexts inserted in the last 24 hours
View All New Contexts inserted in the last 24h

#US military

Page with all the IPSEs stored in the archive with the tag #US military linked to them.
The IPSEs are presented in chronological order based on when the IPSEs have been pronounced.

Martijn Rasser
Martijn Rasser

“The big concern in Washington is the possibility of Beijing gaining control of Taiwan's semiconductor capacity. It would be a devastating blow for the US economy and the ability of the US military to field its [weapon] platforms.”

author
Former senior intelligence officer and analyst at the US Central Intelligence Agency, and now a senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security
01 Jan 2022 4 3
Read More
Zhongping Song
Zhongping Song

“The US warship's transit through the Taiwan Straits is about sending a provocative message, and to encourage Taiwan secessionism, but the US military is not ready for a war with the PLA. So the PLA's [People's Liberation Army] action in the region is not just targeting any specific move made by the US, because the US' intention is clear, and what the PLA is doing is about preparing for the worst case scenario - an all-out military intervention made by US and its allies, and only by doing so, the PLA will be able to defeat all kinds of enemies, especially the foreign interventionist forces, when China launches an operation to reunify Taiwan with the mainland. There is no secret that the military exercises the PLA has conducted around Taiwan are targeting secessionist forces on the island and any foreign forces that support them. We can openly tell them that we are treating them as simulated enemies during those relevant military exercises.”

author
Chinese mainland military expert and TV commentator
18 Sep 2021 9 7
Read More
Clive Stafford Smith
Clive Stafford Smith

“Instead, while we did at least insist on the rights of women, we imported a sense of imperial racism that was redolent of the First Anglo-Afghan War. We rendered life prohibitively expensive without enhancing the wealth of the people (when I wanted to set up a branch of our NGO, it would have cost four times as much in Kabul as it would in Islamabad). And we set up a government that was so legendarily venal and corrupt that the US military referred to it as the V I C E - 'Vertically Integrated Criminal Entity'. Is it surprising that Afghans did not want to indulge in yet another civil war to preserve what we had offered them?”

author
Human rights lawyer and director of the UK charity 3DC, 3dc.org.uk
31 Aug 2021 6 2
Read More
Sahar Khan
Sahar Khan

“The main lesson, which I hope resonates, is a deeper understanding of the limitations of the US military. Past experiences - in Vietnam, Iraq and now Afghanistan - have shown that the military cannot adequately accomplish civilian-centred missions. Military organisations are not equipped for nation building, and they shouldn't be equipped for nation-building.”

author
Research fellow at the Cato Institute
21 Aug 2021 4 2
Read More
Mark Milley
Mark Milley

“In the event of a dispute over some aspect of the elections, by law U.S. courts and the U.S. Congress are required to resolve any disputes, not the U.S. military. I foresee no role for the U.S. armed forces in this process.”

author
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff is the US’s top military officer
10 Oct 2020 3 2
Read More
Liz Cheney
Liz Cheney

“America's forward presence has never been more important than it is today, as our nation confronts the threats to freedom and security around the world posed by Vladimir Putin's Russia and the Chinese Communist Party. Our presence abroad is critical to deterring these adversaries, bolstering alliances, maintaining peace through strength, and preserving American leadership. Withdrawing our forces and abandoning our allies would have grave consequences, emboldening our adversaries and making war more not less likely.”

author
U.S. Representative for Wyoming (Republican Party)
15 Jun 2020 4 2
Read More
IPSEs by Context
May
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
0102030405
06070809101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031
IPSEs by City
IPSEs by Author
IPSEs by Entity
IPSEs by Country
arrow