IPSE'S AUTHORS LAST 24h
Check all the Authors in the last 24h
IPSEs IN THE LAST 24H
  • Baris Altintas
    Baris Altintas “MLSA [Media and Law Studies Association] lawyers are currently assisting detained journalists AFP photo-reporter Yasin Akgul, freelance photo reporter Bulent Kilic, and Zeynep Kuray at the Vatan Police Headquarters. Journalist Emre Orman, who is sought by police, is also a client of MLSA. MLSA will provide legal support to any journalists who do not have legal counsel.” 10 hours ago
  • Anitta Hipper
    Anitta Hipper “Let me recall the European Council's conclusion from 21 March, where the Council is also reiterating its unwavering support to Ukraine's independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity. And the last point on these referendums, that were a total sham and [conducted] at gunpoint. When it comes to the discussion on peace talks, our position is very clear, and I would like to reiterate two main points. One, the EU's position for peace is that it is for Ukraine to decide the actual conditions, and the second point that nothing about Ukraine without Ukraine.” 11 hours ago
  • Guo Jiakun
    Guo Jiakun “Let me stress that the report is completely false. China's position on the Ukraine crisis is clear and consistent.” 11 hours ago
View All IPSEs inserted in the Last 24h

#Canada

Page with all the IPSEs stored in the archive with the tag #Canada linked to them.
The IPSEs are presented in chronological order based on when the IPSEs have been pronounced.

“As Trump's call with Xi looms, it appears the Chinese president is giving diplomacy a chance to work as it did in the cases of Canada and Mexico. Delaying the tariff implementation until February 10 will allow for top level leadership to meet before then, which still creates an opportunity for both sides to step back from the brink and de-escalate the situation.”

author
Chief economist for China at the Dutch financial firm ING
Read More

“I am absolutely convinced that we can deal with these issues, and there are always issues between allies. There are always issues, sometimes bigger, sometimes smaller. But I'm absolutely convinced that will not get in the way of our collective determination to keep our deterrence strong.”

author
Secretary General of NATO
Read More

“It doesn't make much economic sense. Historically, most of our tariffs on raw materials have been low because we want to get cheaper materials so our manufacturers will be competitive ... Now, what's he talking about? He's talking about tariffs on raw materials. I don't get the economics of it.”

author
Senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies and a former U.S. trade official
Read More

“Consumers are going to be clearly worse off. When you talk about a tariff, it's an economic war; and in war, everybody loses. But hopefully we will come to some better results and conclusions as a result of the pain and suffering that we will go through.”

author
Professor of finance and economics at Loyola Marymount University and chief economist at SS Economics
Read More

“The tariffs on imports from Canada, Mexico, and China send a powerful message that the United States will no longer stand by as other nations fail to halt the flow of illegal drugs and immigrants into our country. These measures will also bring in billions in new revenue to the U.S. government.”

author
Congressman Republican-Missouri
Read More

“Today, I have implemented a 25% Tariff on Imports from Mexico and Canada (10% on Canadian Energy), and a 10% additional Tariff on China. This was done through the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) because of the major threat of illegal aliens and deadly drugs killing our Citizens, including fentanyl. We need to protect Americans, and it is my duty as President to ensure the safety of all. I made a promise on my Campaign to stop the flood of illegal aliens and drugs from pouring across our Borders, and Americans overwhelmingly voted in favor of it.”

author
President of the United States
Read More

“If the tariff order takes effect, it will negatively impact all three countries - China, Mexico, and Canada - key US trading partners. Chinese investments in Mexico and Canada will also be affected. It's a lose-lose scenario for all four sides. The US will also bear the cost, as higher tariffs fuel inflation, raise living expenses, and make it harder for the government to maintain control the situation.”

author
Specialist on US affairs at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
Read More

“This is an escalation of US protectionism with no clear economic justification, driving up costs for consumers and businesses while disrupting global supply chains. The US has not specified product categories for the new tariffs, as they may apply broadly rather than targeting specific goods. If the tariffs are put in place, this wide-ranging move will reshape trade and supply chains across all four countries, impacting businesses at large.”

author
Senior research fellow at the Chinese Academy of International Trade and Economic Cooperation
Read More

“You have engines and car seats and other things that cross the border multiple times before going into a finished vehicle. You have American parts going to Mexico to be put into vehicles that are then shipped back to the United States. You throw 25% tariffs into all that, and it's just a grenade. For many U.S. refineries, there's not much choice. Canada produces the type of crude oil that American refineries are geared to process. It's a heavier crude. All the fracking and all the oil and gas we make here in the United States - or most of it - is a lighter crude that a lot of American refineries don't process, particularly in the Midwest.”

author
Vice President, General Economics and Stiefel Trade Policy Center, Cato Institute
Read More

“We don't know if [Trump's tariffs are] going to be on all goods, but we do know that Mexico and Canada have said they are going to respond. If Canada decides to put tariffs on the oil it exports into the US, you could see gas prices really skyrocket. Trump likes to say that other countries pay for the tariffs, that they pay the US government. That's not the case. The people who import the products have to pay the US government, so they raise prices on consumers. Canada has talked about targeting states that supported Trump [in the 2024 election]: oranges in Florida, washing machines in Michigan, dairy products in Wisconsin. So it could really impact the very people who voted for Trump, … but more broadly, you are going to see massive price increases when they retaliate all across the United States.”

author
Al Jazeera’s journalist reporting from Washington, DC
Read More

“It's ironic, because there was such a response to the first tariffs to restructure supply chains, and now you're basically punishing the countries that benefited from that adjustment.”

author
Asian Development Bank Chief Economist
Read More

“Trump tweaking friendly countries harkens back to an aggressive style he used during his days in business. You ask something unreasonable and it's more likely you can get something less unreasonable. Canada is not going to become part of the United States, but Trump's comments are more about leveraging what he says to get concessions from Canada by putting Canada off balance, particularly given the precarious current political environment in Canada. Maybe claim a win on trade concessions, a tighter border or other things. The situation is similar with Greenland. What Trump wants is a win. And even if the American flag doesn't rise over Greenland, Europeans may be more willing to say yes to something else because of the pressure.”

author
Political science professor at the University of Mary Washington in Fredericksburg, Virginia
Read More

“Trump often threatened to enact harsh policies during his first term in the White House from 2017 to 2021 but didn't always follow through. My initial thought is that this is probably some sort of negotiating tactic rather than something he actually wants to go through with - in part because it would be hugely damaging to the American economy. He's being a bully, which is what he is, and he's making these kind of threats to see what kind of goodies he can get. The Republican's remarks about fentanyl and irregular migration appear more geared towards Mexico than Canada. That's not really an issue in Canada-US relations.”

author
Hudson research chair in Canada-US relations at St Francis Xavier University in Canada
Read More

“All the developing countries look very united behind $1.3 trillion. That's not a ceiling. That's what they want. That's what they think they need. The U.S. and Canada are constantly talking about a floor of $100 billion.... So you've got $100 billion at one end and $1.3 trillion on the other end. While poor countries have come up with a number for the total final package, the rich donor nations have assiduously avoided giving a total, choosing to pick a figure late in the bargaining game.”

author
Policy lead at Mercy Corps
Read More

“The human rights violations taking place across Myanmar, including airstrikes on civilian infrastructure, by the Myanmar military is unacceptable and the impact on innocent civilians is intolerable. That is why today the U.K. is announcing fresh sanctions targeting the suppliers of equipment and aviation fuel to the Myanmar military. Alongside the EU and Canada, we are today further constraining the military's access to funds, equipment and resources. The U.K. remained steadfast in our support for the Myanmar people and their aspirations for a peaceful and democratic future.”

author
Junior U.K. foreign minister
Read More

“A US F-22 shot down the object in Canadian territory using an AIM 9X missile following close coordination between US and Canadian authorities.”

author
Pentagon spokesperson - Military officer and United States Air Force brigadier general
Read More

“Everything we discussed has been leaked to the paper; that's not appropriate. If there is sincerity, we can communicate well with mutual respect, otherwise the outcome will not be easy to tell.”

author
President of the People's Republic of China
Read More

“To be effective in solving complex problems, interstate dispute, or war; you have diplomacy, you've got economics, you've got humanitarian support, and you have got the military. Canada has been active in diplomacy, by the way diplomacy obviously has failed because otherwise Putin wouldn't have attacked. Economic; the sanctions (are) valuable but they are not stopping the Russian battlegroups from grinding away and essentially killing Ukraine citizens. Humanitarian support is after the fact where you try to remediate the damage and the tragedy. We have done a good job at bringing refugees to Canada. I am told about 10,000 Ukrainians so far, some medical supplies. But on the military side we are lacking. For 5 years Canada did not allow Ukraine to acquire weapons from Canada. That was a conscious government decision because they were asking. And then when the push came to shove 3 days before the attack we send a couple boxes of weapons and then some old anti tank systems and then some other stuff and then now we've stopped again. As well we only have 600 troops in Europe right now and we are talking of a need of multiple thousands. So to demonstrate leadership we've got to do more. Not just in the first three areas I mentioned but also in the military side because if we don't deter Putin he may try something else.”

author
Retired Canadian lieutenant-general
Read More

“Yesterday, we announced that we would be sending new shipments of military supplies, including body armour, helmets, gas masks and night vision goggles. Today we are announcing that we will be supplying Ukraine with anti-tank weapons systems and upgraded ammunition...Today, we are announcing our intention to ban all imports of crude oil from Russia, an industry that has benefited President Putin and his oligarchs greatly. This industry accounts for more than a third of Russia's federal budget revenues, and while Canada has imported very little amounts in recent years, this measure sends a powerful message. In addition, it ensures that those who are complicit in President Putin's atrocities cannot escape the consequences of their actions. This is why it was announced that Russia oligarchs will be prevented from using their wealth to buy citizenship abroad and avoid the consequences of sanctions.”

author
Prime Minister of Canada
Read More

“We are learning about this virus after two years, almost two years, and we know that it is inevitable now that most of us in the province will be exposed at some point, the way that this virus is being transmitted, this strain of the virus is being transmitted in communities across the province. It is over time very likely that all of us will have exposure to it. How it affects us depends on our own actions and what we are doing.”

author
Provincial Health Officer for British Columbia
Read More
IPSEs by Author
IPSEs by Entity
IPSEs by Country
arrow