Ipse by Tag - Biden administration

Mike Johnson

Inserted 1 week ago

“I will continue to engage with the White House to insist upon a proper response. The Biden Administration's undermining of Israel and appeasement of Iran have contributed to these terrible developments.”

Aje

US House of Representatives Speaker

13 Apr 2024 4 1

Marwan Bishara

Inserted 3 months ago

“One really has to look deep to see if there is any meaningful explanation for why the Biden administration wants to bypass Congress in order to expedite weapons to a country that is involved in war crimes. The move is morally scandalous given that the war has caused record damage and killed tens of thousands of Palestinian civilians. But it is also politically suspect in the sense that why would you want to bypass Congress twice in the same month? What is the urgency to bypass your own guidelines?”

Aljazeera

Senior political analyst at Al Jazeera

30 Dec 2023 3 3

Patty Culhane

Inserted 3 months ago

“We've been hearing from all the top Biden administration officials for weeks that it is time for Israel to move to a lower-intensity conflict. In essence, stop the mass bombing. Stop the mass deaths of civilians. So, in that context - knowing that is what they say they want - they are now selling to Israel the exaction munitions they need to continue a high-intensity campaign.”

Aljazeera

Al Jazeera’s journalist reporting from Washington, DC

29 Dec 2023 4 3

Mona Yacoubian

Inserted 11 months ago

“The US position under President Joe Biden reflects a tricky, gnarly, complex challenge. The Biden administration perhaps has made a calculus that, 'Okay, the region is moving forward with normalisation. Perhaps the issue then is to get something for it, get concessions'. But without accountability for Syrian government abuses, Washington will not normalise its relations with Damascus or ease its heavy sanctions, including the blocking of foreign reconstruction funds. Frankly, given Assad and given his role and given the lack of accountability, it's very hard - if not impossible - to imagine that the US is going to shift its position with respect to either normalising ties or yielding on the issues around reconstruction, lifting sanctions.”

Aljazeera

Vice president of the Middle East and North Africa centre at the US Institute of Peace (USIP), a think tank funded by the US Congress

19 May 2023 3 1

Lindsey Graham

Inserted 1 year ago

“To the Germans: Send tanks to Ukraine because they need them. It is in your own national interest that [Russian President Vladimir] Putin loses in Ukraine. To the [US President Joe] Biden Administration: Send American tanks so that others will follow our lead.”

Aljazeera

Senator from South Carolina and member of the Republican Party

21 Jan 2023 (approx) 7 1

Marwan Bishara

Inserted 1 year ago

“Now the Biden administration says it wants to resume the work of the Obama administration, which held the first US-Africa summit in 2014, by pursuing an African agenda free of the usual paternalism and based on mutual interest and mutual respect. It pledges to listen to instead of lecturing its African partners and to pursue sustainable policies that are in the best interest of the continent.”

Aljazeera

Senior political analyst at Al Jazeera

13 Dec 2022 3 2

Justin Amash

Inserted 1 year ago

“The Biden administration's position that Ukraine alone decides whether to negotiate with Russia is absurd. The moment the US began providing weapons and support in a hot war is the moment the president owed a duty to the American people to engage directly to facilitate peace.”

Aljazeera

US lawyer who formerly served as the representative for Michigan’s 3rd congressional district

25 Oct 2022 4 3

Harry Kazianis

Inserted 2 years ago

“Unless he begins testing them again, North Korea will never rise to the status of something that Joe Biden will use political capital to tackle. I do think at this point the North Koreans just threatened to test ICBMs [inter-continental ballistic missile] and nuclear weapons if they do not see any progress in their goals - getting Joe Biden's attention and the possibility of sanctions relief. The Biden administration will not respond to the specific threat beyond the "normal tough-sounding statements. However, if Kim [Kim Jong-un] does test an ICBM or nuclear weapon, that would violate Washington's unofficial red line that such tests mean more pressure on the DPRK.”

Koreatimes

Senior director of Korean Studies at the Center for the National Interest

20 Jan 2022 7 2

Leif-Eric Easley

Inserted 2 years ago

“North Korea is trying to lay a trap for the Biden administration. It has queued up missiles that it wants to test anyway and is responding to US pressure with additional provocations in an effort to extort concessions. North Korea should be offered humanitarian assistance once it is willing to diplomatically reengage. But its threats should not be rewarded with international recognition or sanctions relief.”

Aljazeera

Professor at Ewha University in Seoul

14 Jan 2022 6 3

Su Chang

Inserted 2 years ago

“The COVID-19 pandemic has dealt a heavy blow to Central Asian countries, and the economy in Kazakhstan also suffered from the breaking-off of trade and flights. In recent years, protests by the younger generation incited by nationalism have increased, shedding light on domestic problems and also explaining why the protests spread quickly to many cities. Who would benefit most from the riots? Probably the US and the West. Kazakhstan shares borders with both China and Russia, and the Biden administration's strategic purpose is to contain China and Russia. When Kazakhstan falls into chaos, the stability of the whole region would be affected.”

Globaltimes

Research fellow at the Institute of Russian, Eastern European and Central Asian Studies at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences

06 Jan 2022 6 2

Kerry Boyd Anderson

Inserted 2 years ago

“The Biden administration sees China as an increasingly assertive economic, military and political competitor. Washington is keenly aware that Beijing is working to assert the superiority of its style of autocratic government, in direct contrast to liberal democracy. Biden's recent Summit for Democracy served several purposes for the administration, including building a network of countries that reject China's more authoritarian approach. At the same time, the Biden team does not believe it is possible or desirable to fully isolate China. Rather, they seek to balance competition with the pragmatic understanding that the two countries must cooperate on some economic and environmental issues.”

Arabnews

Writer and political risk consultant with more than 18 years of experience as a professional analyst of international security issues and Middle East political and business risk

25 Dec 2021 6 4

Belen Fernandez

Inserted 2 years ago

“The Joe Biden administration has just reinstated the so-called 'Migrant Protection Protocols' (MPP) - the criminally euphemistic Donald Trump-era policy that saw Tijuana and other Mexican border cities converted into holding pens for asylum seekers in the US.”

Aljazeera

Contributing editor at Jacobin Magazine

19 Dec 2021 7 3

Tom Fowdy

Inserted 2 years ago

“Biden administration's announcement [diplomatic boycott of the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics] is fueled by obvious opportunism. It is adecision which allows them to whip up anti-China sentiment, but comes with very little sacrifice or cost.”

Globaltimes

British political and international relations analyst

07 Dec 2021 7 4

Wu Xinbo

Inserted 2 years ago

“Considering the Biden administration has not taken any concrete action to correct its wrong words and actions on the Taiwan question, China will continue exerting pressure on the US government, and the latest talk between Wang and Blinken shows that the two sides are still working on this matter. It's hard to say whether China and the US will reach any consensus on this question, but the US has to make some concrete promises in accordance with the one-China principle and in response to China's concerns, otherwise it would affect the outcome of the meeting between the top leaders as well as the future China-US relationship.”

Globaltimes

Director of Fudan University’s Centre for American Studies

14 Nov 2021 7 4

Park Won-gon

Inserted 2 years ago

“As Kritenbrink [Daniel Kritenbrink] is a key figure in the Biden administration regarding regional matters, his meetings with the presidential candidates, with Moon [Moon Jae-in] still remaining in office, indicates the U.S. policy direction is to prepare for the next South Korean government, while seeking to maintain the status quo with the current administration. The assistant secretary is a China expert and the Biden administration's priority is to curb China's global influence, but the current South Korean government is not actively engaged in the U.S.-led anti-China alliance. In that sense, the meetings between Kritenbrink and the presidential candidates [Lee Jae-myung and Yoon Seok-youl] are delivering a message that the U.S. cares about who will be in power here during its campaign against Beijing.”

Koreatimes

Professor of North Korean studies at Ewha Womans University

09 Nov 2021 8 3

Xin Qiang

Inserted 2 years ago

“From an objective perspective, the US has no ability to change China's political system, and Sullivan's [Jake Sullivan] remarks also showed that the US government has given up on the fantasy of changing Chinese system through keeping in touch with the country or suppressing it. But US political elites, especially in the Biden administration, have aspired to change China's political system for a long time. Then they gradually found out that it's a mission impossible whether by means of pressure from the Trump administration or a cooperative rivalry strategy from the Biden administration. The problem is not that the US government does not want to change China, but the US does not have the ability to do that, and would only hit a bumpy road if not working with China.”

Globaltimes

Deputy director of the Center for US Studies at Fudan University in Shanghai

08 Nov 2021 4 4

Xiang Lu

Inserted 2 years ago

“Those remarks showed that the Biden administration tried to play down its rhetoric on US-China relations compared to earlier this year, as it understood that consistently emphasizing confrontation or rivalry doesn't benefit long-term bilateral relations. In diplomacy, the current US government is also trying to distinguish itself from the former Trump administration, and we welcome this change.”

Globaltimes

Specialist on US affairs at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences

08 Nov 2021 5 2

Jake Sullivan

Inserted 2 years ago

“The goal of America's China policy is to create a circumstance in which two major powers are going to have to operate in an international system for the foreseeable future. And we want the terms of that kind of co-existence in the international system to be favorable to American interests and values. Under such a circumstance, the rules of the road reflect an open, fair, free Indo-Pacific region and an open, fair, as well as free international economic systems. One of the errors of previous approaches to policy toward China has been a view that through US policy, we would bring about a fundamental transformation of the Chinese system, which is not the object of the Biden administration.”

Globaltimes

US National Security Adviser

07 Nov 2021 7 3

Park Won-gon

Inserted 2 years ago

“It is partly because the Biden administration is focusing on domestic issues in its first year, with less attention being paid to foreign policy. Previous assistant secretaries of state for East Asian and Pacific affairs used to be those well aware of North Korea issues, but Biden's pick for the post, Daniel Joseph Kritenbrink, is a China expert, so the ambassador to South Korea this time will have a larger role than before in dealing with the North Korea nuclear issue. There have been some rumors since April, but it is still unpredictable with no visible candidate as of the moment. It could be a signal that South Korea has fallen behind in diplomatic priority.”

Koreatimes

Professor of North Korean studies at Ewha Womans University

07 Nov 2021 5 4

Sandra Oudkirk

Inserted 2 years ago

“We are committed to deepening our ties with Taiwan. US support for Taiwan is rock solid. We are going to continue to advance global and regional goals of the Biden administration, including countering malign PRC [People's Republic of China] influence, recovering from the devastating impacts of the pandemic and addressing the threat of climate change.”

Aljazeera

Director of the American Institute in Taiwan

29 Oct 2021 7 2

Ipse Dixit

Ipse Dixit

Tag

IPSE'S AUTHORS LAST 24h

IPSEs IN THE LAST 24H

NEW CONTEXTS IN THE LAST 24H

#Biden administration

“I will continue to engage with the White House to insist upon a proper response. The Biden Administration's undermining of Israel and appeasement of Iran have contributed to these terrible developments.”

“To the Germans: Send tanks to Ukraine because they need them. It is in your own national interest that [Russian President Vladimir] Putin loses in Ukraine. To the [US President Joe] Biden Administration: Send American tanks so that others will follow our lead.”

“The Biden administration's position that Ukraine alone decides whether to negotiate with Russia is absurd. The moment the US began providing weapons and support in a hot war is the moment the president owed a duty to the American people to engage directly to facilitate peace.”

“The Joe Biden administration has just reinstated the so-called 'Migrant Protection Protocols' (MPP) - the criminally euphemistic Donald Trump-era policy that saw Tijuana and other Mexican border cities converted into holding pens for asylum seekers in the US.”

“Biden administration's announcement [diplomatic boycott of the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics] is fueled by obvious opportunism. It is adecision which allows them to whip up anti-China sentiment, but comes with very little sacrifice or cost.”

IPSEs by Context

April

IPSEs by City

IPSEs by Author

IPSEs by Entity

IPSEs by Country

Mon	Tue	Wed	Thu	Fri	Sat	Sun
01	02	03	04	05	06	07
08	09	10	11	12	13	14
15	16	17	18	19	20	21
22	23	24	25	26	27	28
29	30

Mon	Tue	Wed	Thu	Fri	Sat	Sun
01	02	03	04	05	06	07
08	09	10	11	12	13	14
15	16	17	18	19	20	21
22	23	24	25	26	27	28
29	30

Mon	Tue	Wed	Thu	Fri	Sat	Sun
01	02	03	04	05	06	07
08	09	10	11	12	13	14
15	16	17	18	19	20	21
22	23	24	25	26	27	28
29	30