IPSE'S AUTHORS LAST 24h
  • No New Authors inserted in the last 24 hours
Check all the Authors in the last 24h
IPSEs IN THE LAST 24H
  • Abbas Araghchi
    Abbas Araghchi “If there is similar willingness on the other side, and they refrain from making unreasonable and unrealistic demands, I believe reaching an agreement is likely.” 2 hours ago
  • James David Vance
    James David Vance “Since there are the negotiations I won't prejudge them, but we do feel optimistic that we can hopefully bring this war, this very brutal war, to a close.” 2 hours ago
  • Marco Rubio
    Marco Rubio “We need to figure out here now, within a matter of days, whether this is doable in the short term, because if it's not, then I think we're just going to move on. If it's not possible, if we're so far apart that this is not going to happen, then I think the president is probably at a point where he's going to say, 'well, we're done'.” 2 hours ago
  • Phillips O’Brien
    Phillips O’Brien “They can certainly keep Ukraine in the fight. A lot of it depends on what the US does. We have to be careful about that. If the US actually moves to fully backing Russia and provides Russia with a significant amount of intelligence and support, that will be really a problem for Ukraine and Europe. But assuming, say, the US just pulls out and washes its hands of it, Europe has the resources to keep Ukraine going. It would require mobilisation, effort, a significant amount of commitment on Europe's part. So far, they've not, I think, shown the united will to do that, but they certainly could do it if they wanted to. They have the money. They have the technological know-how. They even have the military equipment to make a significant difference.” 3 hours ago
View All IPSEs inserted in the Last 24h
NEW CONTEXTS IN THE LAST 24H
  • No New Contexts inserted in the last 24 hours
View All New Contexts inserted in the last 24h

United States

Page with all the IPSEs stored in the archive related to United States.
The IPSEs are presented in chronological order based on when the IPSEs have been pronounced.

“We need to figure out here now, within a matter of days, whether this is doable in the short term, because if it's not, then I think we're just going to move on. If it's not possible, if we're so far apart that this is not going to happen, then I think the president is probably at a point where he's going to say, 'well, we're done'.”

author
U.S. Secretary of State
Read More

“We may find ourselves in the challenging scenario in which our dual-mandate goals are in tension. If that were to occur, we would consider how far the economy is from each goal, and the potentially different time horizons over which those respective gaps would be anticipated to close.”

author
Federal Reserve Chair
Read More

“What is the Trump administration's grand strategy for China? They don't have a grand strategy yet. They have a range of disconnected tactics. I remain hopeful that Mr. Trump could reach deals with Japan, South Korea, India, Taiwan and the European Union that would allow them to confront Chinese trade practices together, attract allied investment in U.S. industry and increase security ties. If you are up against someone big, you need to get bigger scale - and that's why we need our allies to be with us.”

author
One of America's leading China strategists, now at the Council of Foreign Relations and Georgetown University
Read More

“I think it's [rising Treasury yields] a pretty serious indicator of concern. It's not necessarily the case that investors expect the US government to be unable to repay its debts in the near term, but investors are facing a lot of uncertainty with regards to the direction of the US economy. There is still a lot of uncertainty, and the market situation is quite fragile. What will happen at the end of the 90-day pause? How will the trade war with China evolve? For bonds specifically, China is the second-largest foreign holder of US government debt, so one potential escalation could see China strategically unloading some of those positions.”

author
Assistant professor of finance at the Haas School of Business of University of California Berkeley
Read More

“No government - regardless of which party is in power - should dictate what private universities can teach, whom they can admit and hire, and which areas of study and inquiry they can pursue.”

author
President of Harvard University
Read More

“Drones and robotics are widely considered the future of warfare, and based on everything we are seeing, the critical inputs for our future supply chain are shut down.”

author
Executive chairman and chief executive of MP Materials
Read More

“While Ukraine has accepted President Trump's ceasefire proposal, Putin continues to show he is more interested in bloodshed than in peace. Targeting innocent civilians as they gather to worship on Palm Sunday is beyond the pale.”

author
Republican Congressman, chairman of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs
Read More

“What the market really didn't like was the random crazy math of the tariffs. It seemed like they didn't know what they were doing and didn't care. It's a whole new level of madness.”

author
Nobel laureate economist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Read More

“If, in fact, we are witnessing a total ideological shift of America away from its post-World War II role as guarantor of the international order and an alignment with Putin and other authoritarian nationalists against the old allies that constituted the liberal world order there couldn't be anything more dramatic than that.”

author
Chief executive of the Institute for Strategic Dialogue
Read More

“The president really doesn't want to use the military here. Similar to how other recent presidents dealt with Iran, Mr. Trump appears to have considered what a military campaign would look like, and what it could actually accomplish, and opt to try the diplomatic track first. Mr. Trump is planning to visit Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates as soon as next month. What he is hearing from all Arab leaders he's talking to is that they do not want more war.”

author
Senior Fellow at Washington Institute for Near East Policy - Formerly the Pentagon's top Middle East policy official
Read More

“If Trump wants to argue that their tariffs on US goods are too high, or they are manipulating their currency values, or they are dumping, or they are using clandestine internal tax systems and regulations to disadvantage US exports, he could document these practices and use US trade laws to justify administrative trade restrictions to correct them.”

author
Professor emeritus of economics at Babson College, who specialises in trade policy
Read More

“You have to have flexibility. I could say, here's a wall and I'm gonna go through that wall. I'm gonna go through it no matter what. Keep going and you can't go through the wall. Sometimes you have to be able to go under the wall, around the wall, or over the wall. These guys know that better than anybody, right? You got to go around them sometimes, you're not gonna go through them.”

author
President of the United States
Read More

“Trump has never gone into a back-alley brawl where the other side is willing to brawl and use the same kind of tactics as him. For China, this is about their sovereignty. This is about the Communist Party's hold on power. For Trump, it might just be a political campaign.”

author
Senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies
Read More

“We're seeing businesses like Walmart readjust their profit predictions for the year, lowering their expectations, and investors responding in kind by selling stocks. Apple, the maker of the iPhone that does a lot of business with China, their stocks continue to be lower. US auto manufacturers are also seeing declines in their shares. Broadly speaking, the market is now about 19 percent lower than its record highs. Analysts are comparing it with the beginning of the pandemic when the market had its last serious rout.”

author
Al Jazeera’s journalist reporting from New York City
Read More

“Trump has not articulated where we're going and it's hard to find anyone who's not a paid publicist for him who thinks this is a good idea.”

author
Former chief economist at the International Monetary Fund - Professor at Harvard University
Read More

“It will not be the end of free trade, but it is certainly a retreat from unfettered free trade, which is the way the world seemed to be going. Logically, this would be a time when the rest of the world bands together to promote free trade among themselves. The reality is, it's going to be every country for itself.”

author
Professor of trade policy at Cornell University
Read More

“Why wouldn't a pause make sense? The risk of not doing so is that the massive increase in uncertainty drives the economy into a recession, potentially a severe one.”

author
American hedge fund manager
Read More

“I know there has been some tough language. I know that there have been allies, for example, this side of the pond being worried about the long-term commitment of the U.S. to NATO. The Americans have stated again and again, 'We are committed to NATO. We are committed to Article 5'.”

author
Secretary General of NATO
Read More

“The inflationary impact of Trump's tariffs will be felt sooner rather than later, even as some of his team are scrambling to claim there will be negotiations on lowering some of the tariffs. This is because importers and distributors will have to reassess the profitability of the goods they are ordering now. Supply chains may well be further disrupted by countermeasures from the countries affected.”

author
Fellow at the Foreign Policy Research Institute
Read More

“The stakes for manufacturers could not be higher. Many manufacturers in the United States already operate with thin margins. The high costs of new tariffs threaten investment, jobs, supply chains and, in turn, America's ability to outcompete other nations and lead as the pre-eminent manufacturing superpower.”

author
President and CEO of the National Association of Manufacturers
Read More

“China is likely going to release some type of retaliation against the US … while Japan has said it will also consider some type of retaliatory duties, we expect US agriculture to be mainly in the crosshairs there. That said, a lot of other Asian markets aren't really in a position to retaliate. Places like Vietnam, Malaysia, the Philippines, they have been hit with higher tariffs, but the size of their economy, their dependence on external trade, and the importance of the US as a source of final demand will really constrain their ability to adopt a hawkish attitude here.”

author
Principal economist for Asia at the Economist Intelligence Unit
Read More

“Most countries will favour other policy levers over retaliatory tariffs. I think that central banks will ease monetary policy [by lowering interest rates to try and boost growth]. Global trade will be a lot weaker and international supply chains will be shortened. The multilateral era is dying.”

author
Managing director at TS Lombard - a London-based financial research firm
Read More

“For decades, our country has been looted, pillaged, raped and plundered by nations near and far, both friend and foe alike. Foreign leaders have stolen our jobs. Foreign cheaters have ransacked our factories. And foreign scavengers have torn apart our once-beautiful American dream. April 2, 2025, will forever be remembered as the day American industry was reborn, the day America's destiny was reclaimed. We will charge them approximately half of what they are - and have - been charging us. So, the tariffs will be not a full reciprocal. I could have done that, I guess, but it would've been tough for a lot of countries. We didn't want to do that.”

author
President of the United States
Read More

“This election was viewed as a referendum on Donald Trump and of course, Elon Musk. The results suggest that the influence Trump and Musk wield over American society and voters is not as strong or as deep as one may think or as they may think.”

author
Professor of politics at Hamline University in Saint Paul, Minnesota
Read More

“Let me be clear: Europe did not start this confrontation. We think it is wrong. We have everything we need to protect our people and our prosperity. We have the largest Single Market in the world. We have the strength to negotiate. We have the power to push back. And the people of Europe should know: together we will always promote and defend our interests and values. And we will always stand up for Europe. This confrontation is in no one's interest. We will approach these negotiations from a position of strength. Europe holds a lot of cards: from trade to technology to the size of our market.”

author
President of the European Commission
Read More

“Trump officials can't help but lie. A tariff is a TAX on working families. Trump's dumb tariffs make everyday goods more expensive, no matter how his admin tries to twist it.”

author
American politician serving as the U.S. representative for California's 34th congressional district
Read More

“If Russia and I are unable to make a deal on stopping the bloodshed in Ukraine, and if I think it was Russia's fault - which it might not be - but if I think it was Russia's fault, I am going to put secondary tariffs on oil, on all oil coming out of Russia.”

author
President of the United States
Read More

“Let's be honest, this base, the surrounding area, is less secure than it was 30, 40, years ago, because some of our allies haven't kept up as China and Russia have taken greater and greater interest in Greenland, in this base, in the activities of the brave Americans right here. Denmark has not kept pace with military spending, and Denmark has not kept pace in devoting the resources necessary to keep this base, to keep our troops, and in my view, to keep the people of Greenland safe from a lot of very aggressive incursions from Russia, from China and from other nations. Our message to Denmark is very simple, you have not done a good job by the people of Greenland. You have underinvested in the people of Greenland and you have underinvested in the security architecture of this incredible, beautiful land mass, filled with incredible people.”

author
US Vice President
Read More

“What has become increasingly clear is that Trump's team sees Europe as a parasitic freeloading ally and its liberal democracies as political and ideological adversaries. But this is so contradictory to everything the United States has stood for that we are bound to ask: Can America really tilt this way? Just as Mr. Trump appears determined to weaken checks and balances at home, he is seeking to replicate that externally, dispensing with any rules-based or values-based order. Anything that is a check on whatever he wants to do on whatever day, including Article 5, is something he may tear up. What counts in Trump world are power and interests. For Europe the choice may come down to this: Show teeth or give him what he wants.”

author
Head of the Paris office of the European Council on Foreign relations
Read More

“The reconfiguration of the alliance demanded by Trump can feel more like the end of the alliance. There is no longer even the pretense of a relationship of equals.”

author
Special adviser to the Institut Montaigne, a research organization in Paris
Read More

“It's a tactical retreat - a repositioning to strike harder later. On the one hand, they de-escalated by not carrying out the full cultural mission and skipping the P.R. stunt. On the other hand, it's a symbolic escalation that the highest-ranking official is visiting Greenland, reinforcing Trump's message that it should become American.”

author
Political analyst based in Copenhagen
Read More

“European automakers have been investing in the U.S. for decades, creating jobs, fostering economic growth in local communities, and generating massive tax revenue for the U.S. government. We urge President Trump to consider the negative impact of tariffs not only on global automakers but on U.S. domestic manufacturing as well.”

author
Director General of the European Automobile Manufacturers' Association (ACEA)
Read More

“The belief that prices could be passed on and would be unconditionally accepted by consumers is naive. Car prices in the USA will rise. Only cars manufactured in the USA can be kept somewhat stable, but the entire supply chain will be affected by the tariff disruption. Ultimately, this will lead to declining volumes of new cars, inefficiencies in factory utilisation, and significantly lower margins, free cash flows and ultimately earnings.”

author
Portfolio manager at Union Investment in Frankfurt
Read More

“Everybody will lose. The Americans will lose; Trump will lose, but especially the German car industry [will lose]. Any gains for US manufacturing - as Trump foresees companies rushing to build cars in the country - will not be immediate because it takes time to build production facilities. Instead, a trade war will raise prices for American consumers and incur losses on the US economy. Trump is looking to cause damage to foreign industries. We should really think of retaliation. There is no solution with Trump on the bargaining table.”

author
Head of the Germany-based Center for Automotive Research
Read More
arrow