IPSE'S AUTHORS LAST 24h
Check all the Authors in the last 24h
IPSEs IN THE LAST 24H
  • Amichai Chikli
    Amichai Chikli “The US is not projecting strength under [Biden's] leadership, and it's harming Israel and other countries. He said 'Don't' at the start of the war - to Hezbollah, as well as Iran. We saw the result. If I were an American citizen with the right to vote, I'd vote for Trump and Republicans.” 16 hours ago
  • Nikolay Mitrokhin
    Nikolay Mitrokhin “The return of Crimea is absolutely unrealistic. Before the failure of Ukraine's counteroffensive last summer there was a chance to return the annexed peninsula had Ukrainian forces reached the Azov Sea and started shelling the Crimean bridge and the Kerch Strait that divides the Azov and Black seas. But now it's hardly real to penetrate Russian defence farther than the takeover of the Kinburn peninsula.” 16 hours ago
View All IPSEs inserted in the Last 24h
NEW CONTEXTS IN THE LAST 24H
  • No New Contexts inserted in the last 24 hours
View All New Contexts inserted in the last 24h

Russia - NATO relations

Page with all the IPSEs stored in the archive related to the Context Russia - NATO relations.
The IPSEs are presented in chronological order based on when the IPSEs have been pronounced.

“Russia has chosen a path which is a long-term confrontation ... and the Kremlin is probably anticipating a possible conflict with NATO within the next decade or so. A military attack by Russia is highly unlikely in the short term partly because Russia has to keep troops in Ukraine, and would remain unlikely if Russian buildup of forces was matched in Europe. If we are not prepared, the likelihood (of a military Russian attack) would be much higher than without any preparation.”

author
Estonian military officer
Read More

“NATO is an organisation which is hostile to us and which proves this hostility every day. It is trying its best to make its involvement in the conflict around Ukraine as clear as possible.”

author
Kremlin spokesman
Read More

“The system of mobilisation training in our country was not fully adapted to the new modern economic relations. So I had to fix everything on the go. Military reforms announced mid-January could be adjusted to respond to security threats. Today, such [security] threats include the aspirations of the North Atlantic Alliance to expand to Finland and Sweden, as well as the use of Ukraine as a tool for waging a hybrid war against our country.”

author
Chief of Russia’s military general staff
Read More

“The Russian navy, surface navy at least, is outnumbered four to one by NATO European members alone and by far more by the American navy - so in terms of numbers, there is no contest. Where Russia is equal to the US is in nuclear weapons, which is why President Putin repeatedly emphasises Russia's missile technology because this is the one area in which Russia is still a superpower. The Russian navy has always been considered to have had a relatively high morale and good commanders but it cannot realistically fight NATO … The only area where the navy is actually in action is in the Black Sea and Russia cannot reinforce the navy in the Black Sea.”

author
Senior research fellow on Russia and Europe at the Quincy Institute of Responsible Statecraft
Read More

“Finland and Sweden, as well as other neutral countries, have been participating in NATO military exercises for many years. NATO takes their territory into account when planning military advances to the East. So in this sense there is probably not much difference. Let's see how their territory is used in practice in the North Atlantic alliance.”

author
Russian Foreign Minister
Read More

“They should have no illusions that we will simply put up with it. The general level of military tension will rise, predictability in this sphere will decrease. It is a shame that common sense is being sacrificed to some phantom provision about what should be done in this unfolding situation.”

author
Russian Deputy Foreign Minister
Read More

“The danger is serious, real. And we must not underestimate it. NATO, in essence, is engaged in a war with Russia through a proxy and is arming that proxy. War means war.”

author
Russian Foreign Minister
Read More

“One of the main elements of our initiatives is consciously formulated very clearly and does not allow any ambiguous interpretations. We're talking about the withdrawal of foreign forces, equipment and weapons and other steps to return to the 1997 configuration. These include Bulgaria and Romania.”

author
Statement by Russia's Foreign Ministry
Read More

“A hypothetical Russian invasion of Ukraine would not undermine the security of the United States. The overall logic of Russian actions is that it is the U.S. and NATO that must pay a high price.”

author
Analyst in Moscow
Read More

“Russia wants to see Ukraine not as a neutral country, but more like a friendly country. Ukraine is not the only issue of importance for the Kremlin. This is also about how Russia wants to position itself in the world. So this is a geopolitical conflict focusing on Russia's posture and vision.”

author
Senior analyst for Russia at the International Crisis Group
Read More

“It's very difficult for NATO to do anything which does not protect its own interests and values, obviously starting with the territorial integrity of its allies. NATO can compromise on transparency, how its allies inform each other about military exercises and on positioning certain sensitive weapons systems along borders. But beyond that, NATO will never budge.”

author
Strategy officer at policy group Rasmussen Global
Read More

“If Russia walks away... it will be quite apparent they were never serious about pursuing diplomacy and that is why collectively we are preparing for every eventuality. The heavy pace of bilateral and multilateral engagements this week demonstrates that the United States and our allies and partners are not dragging our feet. It is Russia that has to make a stark choice: de-escalation and diplomacy or confrontation and consequences.”

author
US Deputy Secretary of State
Read More

“There are significant differences between NATO allies and Russia on this issue. Our differences will not be easy to bridge, but it is a positive sign that all NATO allies and Russia sat down around the same table and engaged on substantive topics. The allies had agreed to hold a series of meetings with Moscow on a variety of strategic issues. Russia was not in a position to agree on that proposal. They didn't reject it either, but the Russian representatives made it clear that they needed some time to come back to NATO with an answer.”

author
Secretary General of North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)
Read More

“The situation regarding European security and our national interests has reached a critical line. The alliance [NATO] has been conceived as such [as an instrument of confrontation], and it's how it has been organised and is developing now. It's quite obvious, so the expansion of this mechanism poses a threat to us.”

author
Kremlin spokesman
Read More

“The two sides' positions have only become even more deeply entrenched … and there are two very opposing viewpoints. It seems that nobody is talking about any great breakthroughs at this stage.”

author
Al Jazeera’s journalist
Read More

“It's no exaggeration to say that a moment of truth is coming in our relations with the alliance. Our expectations are entirely realistic and we hope that this will be a serious, deep conversation on key, fundamental problems of European security. We will push for a concrete, substantive, article-by-article reaction to the Russian draft agreement on guarantees.”

author
Russian Deputy Foreign Minister
Read More
IPSEs by Author
IPSEs by Country
arrow