Kaja Kallas POLITICIAN
Moussa Faki Mahamat CHAIRPERSON, POLITICIAN
Adrian Zenz ACADEMIC, ANALYST, RESEARCHER
Matthew Kroenig POLITICAL SCIENTIST
Andriy Yermak POLITICIAN
Vitaly Savelyev POLITICIAN
Oleksandr Korniyenko POLITICIAN
Dainius Kreivys POLITICIAN

View All

Kaja Kallas POLITICIAN
Moussa Faki Mahamat CHAIRPERSON, POLITICIAN
Adrian Zenz ACADEMIC, ANALYST, RESEARCHER
Matthew Kroenig POLITICAL SCIENTIST
Andriy Yermak POLITICIAN
Vitaly Savelyev POLITICIAN
Oleksandr Korniyenko POLITICIAN
Dainius Kreivys POLITICIAN

Context

3

5

IPSEs IN THE LAST 24h

Marwan Bishara “Once again, the US's veto demonstrated a policy of it's my way or the highway. Palestine could only be a country the way the United States sees it, or Israel sees it, only at the time that it's suitable to the United States and within the geopolitics and the global interest of the United States. The US is sacrificing the freedom of Palestinian people for egotistical and narrow interests of the United States and Israel.” 5 hours ago
Brad Setser “Tariffs are currently 7.5 percent on electric vehicle battery packs but 25 percent on the components of those packs. The lower rate should be raised. China had long steered its subsidies to companies that manufacture and source their products in China - and sometimes had required those companies to be Chinese-owned. In order to build up industrial sectors where China has a first-mover advantage and now a cost advantage you need to have an insulated market - and to use some of the tools that China has already used.” 9 hours ago
Lael Brainard “China's policy-driven overcapacity poses a serious risk to the future of the American steel and aluminum industry. China cannot export its way to recovery. China is simply too big to play by its own rules.” 9 hours ago
Ruth Harris “War is a physical human endeavour and you have a force that is utterly exhausted, not slightly fatigued. It's a heavily attritional war. It's messy, it's bloody, there is nothing glorious about this. The glide bombs that are currently used are hugely devastating. They're cheap to make. They are pretty damn accurate and they can be adapted really quickly. They are fast and [the Russians] have a lot of them. This is a war of mass cost and pace. That's the operational factor on the ground.” 14 hours ago
Ali Vaez “We are in a situation where basically everybody can claim victory. Iran can say that it took revenge, Israel can say it defeated the Iranian attack and the United States can say it successfully deterred Iran and defended Israel. If we get into another round of tit for tat, it can easily spiral out of control, not just for Iran and Israel, but for the rest of the region and the entire world.” 14 hours ago

View All IPSEs inserted in the Last 24h

2

Volodymyr Zelenskiy

3
5
2

IPSE'S AUTHORS LAST 24h

Brad Setser Economist
Lael Brainard Economist
Ruth Harris Analyst, Researcher

Check all the Authors in the last 24h

IPSEs IN THE LAST 24H

Marwan Bishara “Once again, the US's veto demonstrated a policy of it's my way or the highway. Palestine could only be a country the way the United States sees it, or Israel sees it, only at the time that it's suitable to the United States and within the geopolitics and the global interest of the United States. The US is sacrificing the freedom of Palestinian people for egotistical and narrow interests of the United States and Israel.” 5 hours ago
Brad Setser “Tariffs are currently 7.5 percent on electric vehicle battery packs but 25 percent on the components of those packs. The lower rate should be raised. China had long steered its subsidies to companies that manufacture and source their products in China - and sometimes had required those companies to be Chinese-owned. In order to build up industrial sectors where China has a first-mover advantage and now a cost advantage you need to have an insulated market - and to use some of the tools that China has already used.” 9 hours ago
Lael Brainard “China's policy-driven overcapacity poses a serious risk to the future of the American steel and aluminum industry. China cannot export its way to recovery. China is simply too big to play by its own rules.” 9 hours ago
Ruth Harris “War is a physical human endeavour and you have a force that is utterly exhausted, not slightly fatigued. It's a heavily attritional war. It's messy, it's bloody, there is nothing glorious about this. The glide bombs that are currently used are hugely devastating. They're cheap to make. They are pretty damn accurate and they can be adapted really quickly. They are fast and [the Russians] have a lot of them. This is a war of mass cost and pace. That's the operational factor on the ground.” 14 hours ago
Ali Vaez “We are in a situation where basically everybody can claim victory. Iran can say that it took revenge, Israel can say it defeated the Iranian attack and the United States can say it successfully deterred Iran and defended Israel. If we get into another round of tit for tat, it can easily spiral out of control, not just for Iran and Israel, but for the rest of the region and the entire world.” 14 hours ago

View All IPSEs inserted in the Last 24h

NEW CONTEXTS IN THE LAST 24H

View All New Contexts inserted in the last 24h

NATO - Ukraine relations - Russia's point of view

Page with all the IPSEs stored in the archive related to the Context NATO - Ukraine relations - Russia's point of view.
The IPSEs are presented in chronological order based on when the IPSEs have been pronounced.

Anatoly Antonov

Anatoly Antonov

Inserted 1 year ago

“It should become obvious to everyone: No matter what weapons the Americans or NATO supply to the Zelenskyy regime, we will destroy it. It is simply impossible to defeat Russia.”

Russia ambassador to the US

19 Jan 2023 3 2

Read More

Sergey Lavrov

Inserted 1 year ago

“The danger is serious, real. And we must not underestimate it. NATO, in essence, is engaged in a war with Russia through a proxy and is arming that proxy. War means war.”

Russian Foreign Minister

25 Apr 2022 4 2

Read More

Fotios Moustakis

Fotios Moustakis

Inserted 2 years ago

“The truth of the matter is that since 2008 and following the Bucharest NATO Summit Declaration, Russia has made it clear to the West that Ukraine will not be allowed to escape Russian orbit and influence. Russia openly and consistently declared that the Bucharest NATO Summit Declaration in April 2008, which confirmed that Georgia and Ukraine will become NATO members, was a colossal strategic mistake and posed a direct threat to the core strategic interests of Russia. But the invasion of Ukraine is not about re-establishing a Soviet Empire 2.0. It is about securing what is considered vital to Russian strategic interests. If Russian interests are not taken into consideration by the West, Putin will wreck Ukraine, which he is currently in the process of doing. Russia does not have the desire or capacity to fully occupy the country. Neutrality is a panacea to solving the current crisis, and Finland is the model that provides a reasonable path ahead.”

Associate professor in strategic studies at the University of Plymouth

15 Mar 2022 9 5

Read More

Vladimir Putin

Inserted 2 years ago

“Ukraine's accession to NATO could lead to a situation where Ukrainian authorities launch a military action to reclaim control over Crimea or areas controlled by Russia-backed separatists in the country's east. Imagine that Ukraine becomes a NATO member and launches those military operations. Should we fight NATO then? Has anyone thought about it?”

President of Russia

01 Feb 2022 4 2

Read More

Sergei Ryabkov

Inserted 2 years ago

“Unfortunately we have a great disparity in our principled approaches to this. The U.S. and Russia in some ways have opposite views on what needs to be done. We underscore that for us it's absolutely mandatory to make sure that Ukraine never, never, ever becomes a member of NATO. We do not trust the other side, so to say. We need iron-clad, waterproof, bulletproof, legally binding guarantees. Not assurances, not safeguards, guarantees with all the words 'shall, must', everything that should be put in, 'never ever becoming a member of NATO'. It's a matter of Russia's national security.”

Russian Deputy Foreign Minister

10 Jan 2022 4 4

Read More

Jen Psaki

Inserted 2 years ago

“NATO member countries decide who is a member of NATO, not Russia. And that is how the process has always been and how it will proceed.”

White House spokeswoman

06 Dec 2021 3 2

Read More

Pavel Luzin

Inserted 2 years ago

“Russia talks about red lines, but implies Western guarantees of non-deployment of troops and arms in Ukraine, which is equal to admitting that Ukraine is the area of special, if not exclusive, interests of Russia.”

Russia-based expert with the Jamestown Foundation, a think tank in Washington, DC

03 Dec 2021 3 2

Read More

IPSEs by Context

April

IPSEs by City

Herat (Afghanistan)
London (United Kingdom)
Marib (Yemen)

IPSEs by Author

Khairy Jamaluddin POLITICIAN
Dacian Ciolos POLITICIAN
Didier Fassin PROFESSOR

IPSEs by Entity

IPSEs by Country