IPSE'S AUTHORS LAST 24h
Check all the Authors in the last 24h
IPSEs IN THE LAST 24H
  • Sue Mi Terry
    Sue Mi Terry “Now is not the time to lift sanctions, either. Now, in fact, is the time to double down. If Biden wants to prevent North Korea from acting out, he needs to first provide the government with new incentives to talk-and that means new restrictions Washington can use as carrots. Biden, in other words, needs to take North Korean policy off autopilot and launch a proactive effort to deter Pyongyang. Otherwise, he risks encouraging an already emboldened Kim to stage a major provocation.” 12 hours ago
  • Christopher Cavoli
    Christopher Cavoli “Russians don't have the numbers necessary to do a strategic breakthrough. More to the point, they don't have the skill and capability to do it, to operate at the scale necessary to exploit any breakthrough to strategic advantage. They do have the ability to make local advances and they have done some of that.” 13 hours ago
  • Nazar Voloshin
    Nazar Voloshin “The situation in the Kharkiv sector remains complicated but is evolving in a dynamic manner. Our defence forces have partially stabilised the situation. The advance of the enemy in certain zones and localities has been halted.” 18 hours ago
  • Volodymyr Zelenskiy
    Volodymyr Zelenskiy “The situation in the Kharkiv region is generally under control, and our soldiers are inflicting significant losses on the occupier. However, the area remains extremely difficult.” 18 hours ago
  • Bezalel Smotrich
    Bezalel Smotrich “Defense Minister Gallant announced today his support for the establishment of a Palestinian terrorist state as a reward for terrorism and Hamas for the most terrible massacre of the Jewish people since the Holocaust.” 18 hours ago
  • Yoav Gallant
    Yoav Gallant “I must reiterate … I will not agree to the establishment of Israeli military rule in Gaza. Israel must not establish civilian rule in Gaza.” 18 hours ago
View All IPSEs inserted in the Last 24h

China - India relations

Page with all the IPSEs stored in the archive related to the Context China - India relations.
The IPSEs are presented in chronological order based on when the IPSEs have been pronounced.

“The bridge by China is a part of their grey-zone operation which is done below the war threshold level. While presenting the threat of a war, they will continue with their grey-zone operations which is what they are doing by building up the bridge. The overall military threat will keep increasing, it will not decrease. I think we should be losing sleep. But that doesn't seem to be the case. The bridge is intimidation and the troops in place are a big concern.”

author
Defence expert and editor of Force magazine
Read More

“The Chinese are very good at building infrastructure on the border areas and this is just one example of that. The bridge is a part of Chinese infrastructure along the LAC so that they can move well, move quickly and deploy their forces quickly. That is the standard Chinese way of border management. The absence of roads and tracks and motorable sort of infrastructure means India can deploy much more slowly compared with China and because of that China has an advantage.”

author
Defence analyst based in New Delhi
Read More

“Yes, it is a matter of concern that the large-scale buildup has occurred and continues to be in place, and to sustain that kind of a buildup, there has been an equal amount of infrastructure development on the Chinese side. So, it means that they (China) are there to stay. We are keeping a close watch on all these developments, but if they are there to stay, we are there to stay, too.”

author
Indian Army General
Read More

“India's decision to continue to engage with the Quad, meanwhile, is particularly significant. New Delhi is less concerned about the South China Sea than the other nations, and more concerned with its disputed border with China and maritime security in the Indian Ocean. India, the only Quad country that shares a land border with China, has a particularly delicate balancing game to play. Seeing how India plays that game going forward, while maintaining its relationship with the Quad and its commitment to its vision for Asia is, in my view, of immense consequences for the Quad itself but also the future of the region.”

author
Senior researcher at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft
Read More

“The replacement of weapon systems and equipment in the Western Theatre Command has been accelerated in recent years, thanks to tensions with India over border disputes. The PLA [People's Liberation Army] wants to use the weapon upgrades to warn their Indian counterparts, reminding India that the Chinese military has a certain advantage over India in weapons technology with the aim of preventing any more conflict.”

author
Researcher from the Yuan Wang think tank, Beijing-based military science and technology institute
Read More

“We have revised our schedules and demanded soldiers meet higher standards for high-altitude training as we need to deal with a harsher battlefield environment amid increasing challenges in the peripheral areas.”

author
Commande of the Chinese military's Western Theatre Command
Read More

“How you define the 'one China policy' is very different [between countries]. We can always say that we follow the 'one China policy' but Taiwan is not part of China. The U.S. has its own way of maneuvering through this. Whatever India does, its government has to consider things carefully, as unlike with the U.S., China is India's neighbor. Due to our proximity, India's 'one China policy' has to be very nuanced and consider a lot of factors.”

author
Research Associate at the Centre for China Analysis and Strategy
Read More

“Highlighted that unilateral change of status quo is not acceptable. Full restoration and maintenance of peace and tranquility in border areas is essential for development of our ties. Agreed on convening an early meeting of the Senior Military Commanders.”

author
Minister of External Affairs of the Government of India
Read More

“This is fake news [the clash between Chinese and Indian troops]. Based on what I learned, there is no record of this clash in the patrol log of the Chinese side. Small frictions often occur on China-India border area, but a clash that caused multiple injuries will definitely be recorded and reported.”

author
Editor-in-chief of the hawkish mainland Chinese state-run tabloid Global Times
Read More

“I would like to stress though that China’s border troops are committed to upholding peace and tranquillity along the border with India. We urge the Indian side to work in the same direction as us and refrain from actions that might escalate or complicate the situation along the border. We hope both sides will take proper actions to manage their differences and take concrete actions to safeguard peace and stability along the border.”

author
Spokesman for the Chinese foreign ministry
Read More

“It is clarified that there was a minor face-off at Naku La area of North Sikkim on 20 January 2021 and the same was resolved by local commanders as per established protocols.”

author
Statement by Indian Army
Read More

“China-India ties are indeed facing a challenging time but this is mainly caused by efforts to manipulate India into an alliance against China. It would be unfortunate if it were beguiled into such a new strategic posture since this would negatively impact India as well as regional stability and prosperity. India has much more to gain by working with China and not against it.”

author
Senior research fellow at the Beijing-based Center for China and Globalization
Read More

“We are today probably at the most difficult phase of our relationship with China, certainly in the last 30 to 40 years. We could argue even more. The last time there were military casualties on our borders was in 1975, so just to give you a sense of a time there. Now for some reason, for which the Chinese have given us five different explanations, the Chinese have violated it [the agreement that ask both parties not to bring large forces to the boundary]. The Chinese have literally brought tens of thousands of soldiers in full military preparation mode right up to the Line of Actual Control in Ladakh. Naturally, the relationship would be profoundly disturbed by this.”

author
Minister of External Affairs of the Government of India
Read More

“The rift in China-India relations may result in a shift in New Delhi’s policy, in particular its closer engagement with the US and other Indo-Pacific nations, including the further evolution of the Quad [Quadrilateral Security Dialogue]. Certainly that’s not something Moscow would like to transpire as it has always appreciated India’s distinctive course in the Indo-Pacific region.”

author
Researcher at Russian Academy of Sciences
Read More

“On the Night of 29/30 August 2020, PLA [People's Liberation Army] troops violated the previous consensus arrived at during military and diplomatic engagements during the ongoing standoff in Eastern Ladakh and carried out provocative military movements to change the status quo. Indian troops pre-empted this PLA activity on the southern bank of Pangong Tso Lake, undertook measures to strengthen our positions and thwart Chinese intentions to unilaterally change facts on ground.”

author
Official statement of the Indian Army
Read More

“We will not take the initiative to complicate or escalate the situation. Of course, we must also firmly safeguard our sovereignty and territorial integrity. The border between China and India has not been demarcated, so there will always be problems of this kind. We are willing to manage various problems through dialogue with the Indian side.”

author
State Councillor and China's foreign minister
Read More

“This is surely the most serious situation after 1962. In fact, after 45 years, we have had military casualties on this border. The quantum of forces currently deployed by both sides at the LAC is also unprecedented.”

author
Minister of External Affairs of the Government of India
Read More

“For India it is opportune that the U.S. is applying more pressure on China, and if it can get it to behave, that would be welcomed by the entire neighborhood”

author
President of the Center for China Analysis think tank in New Delhi
Read More

“Nationalism is strong under Modi and Xi Jinping, this is a ground reality. This is to be expected because both nations are modern states that have only been around for 70 years or so. We have to revisit this after a month and see if demobilisation has happened. Some reports say that both sides agreed to withdraw three kilometres, but because the Line of Actual Control is in itself a contentious issue, three kilometres from where exactly?”

author
Professor of Chinese Studies at Jawaharlal Nehru University in New Delhi
Read More
IPSEs by Author
IPSEs by Country
arrow