IPSEs IN THE LAST 24H
  • Theresa Fallon
    Theresa Fallon “Many people would like to see China play a constructive role, but I think now that we're in the third year of the war, this idea is wearing a bit thin.” 12 hours ago
  • Mahjoob Zweiri
    Mahjoob Zweiri “What we have witnessed in the past few hours is that they talk about an agreement on the first stage. It could be understood that Hamas wants to release itself from the pressure globally, including the United States. So, they are giving concessions on the first stage, which leads to 40 days of ceasefire and exchange of captives. I think 33 old and sick captives. And then moving on to other stages. But we are seeing that we are going back to the main conditions, which means we are still talking about the main principles [complete ceasefire and withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza] that Hamas talked about. As the time of some sort of agreement on the first stage came, the Israeli military and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu came to say actually, there is no agreement: We will go to Rafah regardless of any agreement. It reflects the divisions within the Israelis and crisis within the Israeli politics. On the other hand, Hamas has been more cautious. They do not want to show real progress made but they also do not want to say things have not changed. I think it's obvious some change has happened otherwise we would not expect [CIA chief] William Burns to be in the region.” 13 hours ago
View All IPSEs inserted in the Last 24h
NEW CONTEXTS IN THE LAST 24H
  • No New Contexts inserted in the last 24 hours
View All New Contexts inserted in the last 24h

1992 consensus

Page with all the IPSEs stored in the archive related to the Context 1992 consensus.
The IPSEs are presented in chronological order based on when the IPSEs have been pronounced.

“Our stance on resolving the Taiwan question and realizing national reunification remains consistent, and our determination is as firm as rock. We will adhere to the 1992 Consensus that embodies the one-China principle and firmly oppose the separatist activities aimed at 'Taiwan independence' as well as foreign interference.”

author
Spokesperson for the State Council Taiwan Affairs Office
Read More

“The mainland encourages and supports normal business exchanges between the two sides of the Taiwan Straits, and protects the legitimate rights and interests of Taiwan compatriots and companies in accordance with the law. However, no one or company is allowed to sabotage cross-Straits relations by providing financial aid to secessionists while making money on the mainland. This attitude is clear and consistent, and Taiwan companies investing in the mainland are well aware of it. There is no room for ambiguity about whether to adhere to the one-China principle and the 1992 Consensus, and whether to oppose or support secessionists.”

author
Spokesperson for China’s Taiwan Affairs Office
Read More

“People on both sides of the Strait [Taiwan Strait] once again fell into a downward malicious spiral. In the past, the two sides of the Strait have had the glory of peaceful and stable development, to which the 1992 consensus was key. Since the KMT's [Chinese Nationalist Party] proposal in September last year of the concept of a 1992 consensus based on the Republic of China Constitution, public understanding and trust in the consensus has gradually recovered.”

author
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman
Read More

“The US and Taiwan must prepare for China's eventual realization that neither peaceful nor coercive tactics would push Taiwanese into accepting reunification. Direct negotiations with Beijing are unlikely, given that the latter has set its desired outcome - Taiwan's acceptance of the so-called '1992 consensus' - as a precondition for resuming talks. Unfortunately, I fear that we're at a stage where deterrence is probably the most important thing Taiwan can do.”

author
Chairman of the American Institute in Taiwan
Read More

“On the one hand, we emphasize the subjectivity of the Republic of China. On the other, we emphasize the importance of the 1992 consensus, of having one China with different interpretations and of seeking common ground while reserving differences. There is no such thing as the party abandoning the idea of cross-strait peace.”

author
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman
Read More

“Resolving the Taiwan question and realizing China's complete reunification is a historic mission and an unshakable commitment of the Communist Party of China. It is also a shared aspiration of all the sons and daughters of the Chinese nation. We will uphold the one-China principle and the 1992 Consensus, and advance peaceful national reunification. All of us, compatriots on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, must come together and move forward in unison. We must take resolute action to utterly defeat any attempt toward 'Taiwan independence,' and work together to create a bright future for national rejuvenation. No one should underestimate the resolve, the will, and the ability of the Chinese people to defend their national sovereignty and territorial integrity.”

author
President of the People's Republic of China
Read More

“The two sides of the Strait need to restore or rebuild a common political foundation. Recognition of the 'consensus' [1992 consensus] would be necessary for Tsai to realize her campaign promise of maintaining the 'status quo' in cross-strait relations. Tsai [Tsai Ing-wen] and the DPP [Democratic Progressive Party] have tarnished the 1992 consensus by equating it with the 'one country, two systems' framework. The Republic of China Constitution does not allow for two Chinas, or one China and one Taiwan. If Tsai would clearly affirm this there could be room for cross-strait dialogue.”

author
Taiwanese politician who served as the sixth president of the Republic of China from 2008 to 2016
Read More

“China's position on the Taiwan question is consistent and clear. There is but one China in the world, and the Taiwan region is an inalienable part of the Chinese territory. China is determined in safeguarding national sovereignty and territorial integrity, and opposing 'Taiwan independence' and interference by external forces. The root cause of the current tension and disturbance in cross-Straits relations lies in the Democratic Progressive Party authorities refusing to recognize the 1992 Consensus which embodies the one-China principle, strengthening contacts with external forces and making provocations in pursuit of 'Taiwan independence'. On the political basis of adhering to the 1992 Consensus and opposing 'Taiwan independence', we stand ready to conduct dialogue and consultation with all political parties, groups and personages in the Taiwan region, so that we can resolve differences and build up consensus on political issues across the Strait and on issues related to promoting the peaceful reunification of China. We urge the U.S. side to earnestly abide by the one-China principle and the three China-U.S. joint communiqués, prudently and properly handle Taiwan-related issues, and refrain from sending any wrong signals to the 'Taiwan independence' forces so as to avoid damaging China-U.S. relations and peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait.”

author
Spokesman for the Chinese foreign ministry
Read More

“No matter how the political situation changes, we [the mainland] still hold the initiative in cross-Strait relations. Mainland China’s general policy towards Taiwan is clear and consistent. We hold firmly to the one-China principle and the 1992 Consensus, to peaceful reunification and One Country, Two Systems, to opposing and containing separatist schemes and actions towards Taiwan independence, and to safeguarding national sovereignty and territorial integrity. We will not tolerate comments that disparage the central government’s policy towards Taiwan and which deny the results of our efforts in Taiwan.”

author
President of the National Society of Taiwan Studies (China’s official think tank on Taiwan issues)
Read More

“I hope that both sides can return to the original concept of the '1992 consensus,' which would enable a meeting. I was the one who built up this 'bridge for peace,' in the hopes of guiding future leaders on both sides of the Taiwan Strait to walk along the 'boulevard of peace'. I implore Tsai [Tsai Ing-wen president of Taiwan], if she cannot present an alternative policy, then she should accept the '1992 consensus,' which can lead to negotiations for peace with China, and Taiwanese can live in peace.”

author
Taiwanese politician who served as the sixth president of the Republic of China from 2008 to 2016
Read More

“Beijing is working to reiterate its insistence on the 'one China' policy and the '1992 consensus' to force our side to accept these political frameworks. However, most Taiwanese have rejected the 'one country, two systems proposal'. The Chinese government must understand this fact. The Chinese leadership must face these political realities and must have the courage to change the way it treats cross-strait relations. It must respect our positions and the will of Taiwanese to allow a discussion over peaceful coexistence.”

author
Taiwan Deputy Minister of the Mainland Affairs Council
Read More
May
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
0102030405
06070809101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031
IPSEs by City
IPSEs by Author
IPSEs by Country
arrow